Predictably, the slots pay a computer-prescribed return: limited by’luck’of the draw in slot winning or losing cycles. So, bet accordingly! A phrase to the wise: make the most of the perks, the advice, and discover the fairly loose machines; otherwise, you’re a certain loser.
We submit to many generic outcomes: not just testing our luck on games of chance but another big gamble: the odds no less insurmountable than Casino gambling. Oddly, no pun intended, the comparison rests within our selection of a beneficial, spiritual, rut, or to even the denial of supernatural existence. Areadomino Here,’chance’depends on whether we’re born Judaic, Christian, Islamic, or as a doubting Thomas. Yet, like playing the slots, we can evaluate our luck of the draw in this regard also. We just have to uncover the paying proposition.
Why compare religious ethos with a questionable ethic like gambling?
If you can accept the diversity in religious customs and their irresponsibility to established rules of engagement, you can wonder at the advantage or outcome in discipline assurances. An interest shrouded in mysterious symbols, numbers, parables, or other unspecific language is no easy topic to decipher, but the dilemma is not impossible to solve.
The slots are easy to find: first, we know they are computers programmed to come back a specific profit to the Casino; second, we know they must have winning and losing cycles to encourage bettors and yet assure profit for the home; third, we know some machines are set to cover a lesser return than others; fourth, every slot winning cycle is followed by way of a losing cycle. Learn to recognize the symptoms. Some players more often than not leave the Casino a winner. Allow yourself to quit a winner.
Back to another chance so commonly abused:
First, any spiritual belief is strictly in the mind;
Second, Daniel clearly limits the monotheism experience to Ten Ages; if one does not know the chronological schedule, then he is subject to much disillusionment and false belief;
Third, Ezekiel advises of a strict limit to benefit, to the kind of Noah, Daniel, and Job;
Fourth, between the statements of Jesus and Paul, a strict limit to time-frame was “accessible” in the Last Age, and was coming to a detailed in A.D. 68.
Therefore, because of the factual observations, thinkers must commit to a reevaluation of the monotheism incentive.
If, because of the conclusions, one still desires to gamble, have a ride on the slots, or chance a religion choice, upon what set of rules or inescapable facts will he select as an edge in these greatly contested gambles? You cannot lose by investigating the syllogistic expressions available nowadays and caused by fifteen years of arduous research.